Julian Young
List Price: $49.95
By: Cambridge University Press
Amazon Marketplace: 1
new & used starting at $166.77
|
Buy at Amazon.com
|
Browse similar items by category:
Subjects -> History -> Historical Study -> History of Ideas
Subjects -> Nonfiction -> Philosophy -> Aesthetics
Subjects -> Nonfiction -> Philosophy -> History & Surveys
Customer Reviews:
Total reviews: 5
Average rating: 4.0 of 5
A necessary book, although you may disagree with it 4 out of 5 stars.
6 of 7 people found this review helpful.
Young's book is billed as the first comprehensive treatment of Nietzsche's philosophy of art to appear in English. This alone makes it a necessity in the library of anyone interested in Nietzsche and Nietzsche's relation to Wagner and to Schopenhauer. But furthermore, Young's evident mastery of the Nietzsche material and his clear writing, make the book not only necessary, but a pleasurable and worthwhile read. Young's "Nietzsche's philosophy of art" calls for a serious reader's engagement even if one must disagree on Young's overall thesis, which this reviewer must do. Young is clearly prepared to write on Nietzsche's philosophy of art. He has already authored a book on Schopenhauer, called "Willing and Unwilling," and has a demonstrable sensitivity to and experience with artworks and art theory. Young begins his book with a treatment of Schopenhauer and Schopenhauer's philosophy of art -- both in terms of how Nietzsche understood them. Nietzsche's famous philosophical relationship to Schopenhauer is well explained. The brilliant and enthusiastic young Nietzsche devoured Schopenhauer and as Young writes,
"Except for the Greeks, there is no other philosopher he knew with anything like the same intimacy. His writings, all of them, are full not just of quotations and paraphrases from Schopenhauer, but of phrases, allusions, and rhythms both conscious and unconscious. Nietzsche breathed Schopenhauer and cannot be understood without him."
Nietzsche always acknowledged a debt to Schopenhauer, even in his later writings, but it is essential to an understanding of the force of Nietzsche's philosophy (and particularly his central notion of "independence of the soul") to see that after Birth of Tragedy (and somewhat within Birth of Tragedy) Nietzsche sets himself adamantly and effectively against Schopenhauer's and Wagner's romanticism, and against the "cry baby optimism" of his age in general.
Young understands correctly, I think, that Nietzsche turned against Schopenhauer early and Wagner too. But after a series of slight misinterpretations, particularly of Nietzsche's treatment of science, his metaphysics or understanding of the natural world, and his ideas of art in "Human, All to Human," Young's over-arching claim is that Nietzsche fails in his anti-Romantic endeavor to live without metaphysics and redemption, and in the end returns to a Schopenhauerian pessimistic philosophy.
For those who see Nietzsche as accomplishing a systematic rebuttal to Romanticism and transcendental philosophies, Young's conclusion that Nietzsche's philosophy is circular or returns to the foil against which it first defined itself, will be unsatisfactory.
Editorial Review:
This is the first comprehensive treatment of Nietzsche's philosophy of art to appear in English. Julian Young argues that Nietzsche's thought about art can only be understood in the context of his wider philosophy. In particular, he discusses the dramatic changes in Nietzschean aesthetics against the background of the celebrated themes of the death of God, eternal recurrence, and the idea of the Ubermensch. Young then divides Nietzsche's career, and his philosophy of art, into four distinct phases, but suggests that these phases describe a circle. An attempt at world-affirmation is made in the central phases, but Nietzsche is predominantly influenced at the beginning and end of his career by a Schopenhauerian pessimism. At the beginning and end art is important because it "redeems" us from life.