Rupert Furneaux
![Ancient mysteries Rupert Furneaux]( "Ancient mysteries Rupert Furneaux")
By: Ballantine Books
Amazon Marketplace: 17
new & used starting at $0.20
|
Buy at Amazon.com
|
Browse similar items by category:
Subjects -> History -> Ancient -> Prehistory
Subjects -> History -> Ancient -> General
Subjects -> History -> Ancient -> General AAS
Customer Reviews:
Total reviews: 5
Average rating: 3.0 of 5
Frustrating book, possibly deserves 2.5 stars 2 out of 5 stars.
6 of 7 people found this review helpful.
I picked up this book expecting a good scientific overview of many mysteries of the ancient world. It covers such interesting topics as megalithic buildings like Stonehenge and the pyramids, biblical mysteries such as the location of Noah's ark, and curiosities of the New World such as the location of Vinland. The book started off nicely with a chapter looking for the location of Atlantis, which gave a good historical and archaeological argument for placing it at Minoan Crete. I figured even though the book is over 20 years old, it would be a good read.I quickly became disappointed. For every interesting and well written chapter, there seems to be one that takes giant leaps of fancy. It's almost like the author had a split personality. The other very annoying thing about the book is that while it was published in 1978, most of the few resources listed date to the late 1960s. There are even a number of sources published in the 50s. Even for the time it was published many of Mr. Furneaux's ideas were greatly out-dated.
A perfect example is his discussion of the end of the ancient Mayan civilization. He would lead you to believe that the only two people studying the ancient Maya were Eric Thompson and Sylvanus Morley. Further, the only works he mentions from them date to the 50s. There is no mention of such well-respected Maya scholars such as Kent Flannery, Michael Coe or Tatiana Proskouriakoff to name a few. They were all well-published on the Maya by the mid-1970s, if not the late 60s.
The chapter immediately following the discussion of the collapse of the Maya civilization, is actually an excellent synopsis of the discovery of Lord Pacal's tomb at Palenque (made famous by von Daniken as proof of ancient astronauts). It's this switching back and forth from reasonable scientific explanation and examination to wild leaps of fancy that make the book so frustrating.
The chapter on the shroud of Turin is very good and current to 1978, long before the church allowed scientists to take a sample of the shroud for radio-carbon dating and it was proved to be a medieval forgery. The chapter on the search for Vinland, the Norse settlement in the New world, is also quite well done. However, these chapters are in sharp contrast to the description of Tiahuanaco in the Bolivian highlands, which goes so far afield as to encompass the Phoenicians. Another questionable chapter covers the fall of the Harrappan civilization in India and Pakistan.
The main problem with the book is that it lacks a point of view. In one chapter Mr. Furneaux is sounding like a disciple of Erich von Daniken, then in the next chapter he is taking Mr. von Daniken and his followers to task for not providing proof for their wildly speculative theories.
If you are interested in the topics covered in this book I recommend you look elsewhere. Paul Bahn has written many popular archaeology books that cover some of these same topics, there is also a book with the same title written in 1999 that seems to have a more solid scientific footing. I would even recommend giving some of the various Time-Life books and series a look.
Editorial Review:
Where was Camelot?
Who sculpted the terrifying effigies of Easter Island?
Has Atlantis been located?
What was the purpose of the Great Pyramid?
Is the ark on Ararat?
What was Stonehenge used for?
Was God an astronaut?
What is the real evidence of extraterrestrial visitation to the earth?
Ageless riddles...mysterious questions... unexpected answers!
